Five cyber resilience challenges and review records
The KCBCA Signals Issue 2 editorial examines five cyber resilience challenges and the review records needed to keep rights, evidence, and responsibility verifiable after systems fail.
Findings from KCBCA Signals and other research, summarised.
The KCBCA Signals Issue 2 editorial examines five cyber resilience challenges and the review records needed to keep rights, evidence, and responsibility verifiable after systems fail.
AI red teaming tests how systems fail under deception. Checks vary for public-sector AI, financial approvals, high-impact deployments, and the testing agents themselves.
Hashes, signatures, and verification histories can add a proof layer to security assurance while keeping originals private. Unchanged records still do not establish truth.
Agents act directly in business systems. Ten checks cover permission separation, transaction limits, independent verification, gradual delegation, and failure testing.
An SBOM records software components, versions, and origins. It needs updates with deployments, evidence tracking, and a wider map of dependencies beyond code.
Hashes help check files, deployed code, and reports for changes. Built-in commands can compare fingerprints, but truth, authorship, and interpretation require separate checks.
AI agents are already making payments, and protected keys do not prevent unwanted approvals. Signals contributions examine spending limits, independent checks, human review and kill switches.
AI-generated faces and voices can induce transfers and wallet approvals. A Hong Kong fraud case and Signals scenarios show why protecting keys must be paired with independent verification.
A public patch can reveal clues to attackers. Private AI-assisted testing should verify root causes and alternative attack paths while treating premature disclosure and incomplete fixes separately.
AI helps attackers find weak suppliers and software dependencies faster. Supply chain security needs current, verifiable evidence, controlled package intake, and visibility into changes.
Instructions hidden in external content can become real actions. Three cases show why analysis, approval, publication, and signing need separate permissions and checks outside AI.